Find a Lawyer

SULTAN MUHAMMAD versus HAJI KHAIR MUHAMMAD

Section 12 was the contract to sell ounces in the Law of Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Arts 17 (2), 79, 117 and 120, in which the defendant demanded the specific performance of the execution agreement by the defendant. But the defendant refused to enforce any agreement. The plaintiff's trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and the decision and order passed by the trial court were upheld by the plaintiffs after the appellate court denied the plaintiff's refusal to enforce the sale agreement. Two witnesses were presented but only one witness was presented. The second witness was presented by the defendants who did not confirm the witness, they were required by law 17, 2, and 79 of Stamp Act 1984. Could not fulfill the agreement on which the contract was written, Vendor issued in favor of, on 30 6 1994. The unidentified person, while the agreement was executed on 15th 1999, also raised doubts about the realism of the contract that Onus was on to the plaintiffs to prove the execution of the contract. On the basis of which they wanted performance but failed to prove their compliance with the law, the two courts erred in the law by considering the unacceptable document, therefore, on the basis of such unacceptable evidence, both the courts Cannot have decisions and orders passed by. It is held that the decisions and orders passed by both the courts were set aside and the case filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed. divorce advocates from Minchanabad lawyer