MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MST. JAN BIBI
A. XXXII, R 15 of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Articles 42 and 54 of the trial court and the appellate court, for the declaration of a permanent dismissal and a suit for permanent injunction which recognized There were no conclusions. The review is jurisdictional, but it claimed that one of the plaintiffs was an insane person and could not be prosecuted without the next friend provided under O XXXII, R 15, CPC. Alihan had made no such objection in his written statements. Filed before the trial court, however, it was reported that one of the defendants was dumb. O XXXXI, R 15, CPC did not apply to anyone who was dumb, disturbing the conclusions of the plaintiff's chances. Could not fit on technical ground. In fact, especially when no objection was made to the trial court or the appeals forum in connection with maintaining the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Mailsi lawyer
