Find a Lawyer

WAQAR AHMED versus PAKISTAN SYNTHETIC LIMITED

Sections 46 and 48 of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), requesting the removal of sections Oz 12 and 13, appeal to the Appellant / Workers' High Court Services, who were permanent employees of the employer company. The company was terminated on the basis of the reorganization of the company that the demand for the company's product, called \ staple fiber as, was not finished and the company had to stop its production. Due to lack of products, the company suffered financial losses and in order to reorganize the company, it had to provide some of its employees with Standing Order 12 (1) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. ), Which caused the company to not produce any record of its production (staple fiber). There was no evidence to prove that the demand and the available stock were staple fiber production. Suffered financial losses on which the appellant / workers were removed thus the company could not prove that the appellant was removed as a senior worker, but the junior workers were retained by the company. Did not remove or discharge all employees working in the factory and no evidence was available That a section of the factory was closed or evidence of employees of a particular group performing certain tasks was removed, on the other hand, it was revealed that some top advocates from Ali Chak lawyer