Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT ALI versus STATE

The benefit of the FIR was filed after a six-day delay in the appreciation case of sections 302 (b) and 365 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), section 7 (a) (c) and 25 evidence. 'S statements were also recorded. Despite the delay and even after their release, none of them had named the accused, the FIR did not show the names of the witnesses present on the occasion, nor did the FIR immediately register Neither the witnesses' statements were immediately recorded nor said there was a delay. Even the statements of eyewitnesses were not interconnected and interconnected because the witnesses did not disclose the presence of the eyewitnesses. He also failed to state that despite his presence in the area, he did not appear to record his statements as soon as the complainant stated that he lodged a complaint after a delay of five days. Have done. Although that statement may not have been sufficient to refute, the statements had to be considered in light of the facts and circumstances of the case. In the present case, the two tribes were hostile to each other over coal mining and mining areas. The dispute was going on, but witnesses, who were residents of the area, had been keeping her mother for a long time and no statement was recorded about hurting the suspects as soon as possible, the police officer who registered the case. The FIR failed to fulfill its duty of filing and waited for the complaint to be filed. The view of the delay in the FIR, AD because of delays in rykardn immigration advocates email from Bagh lawyer