Find a Lawyer

DALEEL KHAN versus SESSIONS JUDGE, KALAT DIVISION

The value of the evidence in section 2 (c) was not disputed by the violent act of defending both of the two late deaths when the victim's violent death was proved by any evidence beyond any doubt, only fact. That the postmortem was not carried out, there was no material or legal consequence. Both the accused confessed to the killing of both the deceased. The object was observed and the male accused escaped, who was later arrested and delayed in killing him. Ordering by itself was not enough to reject such confessional statements; even if both the accused's voluntary and truthful confessional statements were found in the same case, they could not be denied simply because they did not. The correct account was not given in the series. Used in the presence of such a weapon and to the extent that the statement is false, the art of confessional statement was proved with the help of other evidence. Was confirmed by another independent witness where part of the confessional statement was found to be false, the rest of the court confession statement R can rely, who was found to be disputed by other evidence. The prescription was neither comprehensible nor credible because the two defendants, on the charge of supporting their alibi application, did not impose an oath in court, although generally, under oath 34040, their oath The statement cannot stand against the accused for not recording the statement. 2), CCP, but taken by the accused famous high court advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer