Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH ABDUL HAKEEM versus SHAMSUDDIN

Sections 42 and 54 of the Balochistan Civil Dispute (Sharia) Regulations, 1976, Arts 2 (1) Proviso and 4 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 3 (28) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 et al. L, R 27 Local Authority Judges Courts and Magistrates' Jurisdiction Further Evidence, Plaintiff's Production Demands Prohibition Against Road Construction By Local Authority On Their Land The Plaintiff Enforces The Contractor Only As A Party The road was to be constructed but did not implement the directive to the local administration. A road suit was filed in the judge's court on which the case was dismissed, but the Majlis Shura dismissed the appeal by returning the plaintiff to file the case with the plaintiff and the court of jurisdiction taken by the plaintiff. It was argued that after announcing the defamation plan, union councils were formed. There is no local authority or public corporation that was mentioned in the Balochistan Civil Dispute Regulation, 1976 and it was intended to produce additional production. Despite the evidence validation deviation plan, local government including union councils The control and management of the funds were entrusted to the government, which were the civic powers, which were meant under Article 2 (1) of the Balochistan Civil Disputes (Sharia) Rule 1976. And no lawsuit can be established by or against a local authority in the forums provided under the Regulation. The local authority was an integral party in this matter and the courts established under the Balochistan Civil Disputes (Conditions Application) Regulation, 1976 had no jurisdiction over the matter. To allow the plaintiff to present additional evidence immigration advocates from Khuzdar lawyer