Find a Lawyer

ALIA HUSSAIN versus SYED ZIAUDDIN

The statements of the petitioner (the owner) under Section 7, Section 7, Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005 were that he was a widow and a domestic wife. That after the death of her husband, she moved with her young children to another city and closed the house. The respondents had forcibly opened the door and the house was occupied The respondents were confronted by a position that relied on the document (the contract to sell the property in question) which was allegedly executed by the woman and reported. It was reported that a sum of Rs.1,00,000 was paid and that a civil suit was filed by both parties and that the petition was not retained under Section 7, Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 which It turns out that the documents contained were drafted at a later stage and were never investigated or investigated before the police. The officer presented, as it turned out, was not in accordance with the record of the woman's original signatures in the alleged document requesting the sale, so some fraud was played out in the case, which was merely the execution of the contract. It would not be enough to end the withdrawal proceedings, and the applicant filed a lawsuit temporarily entitled to her. r Section 7 of the Illegal Settlement Act 2005, the police were directed to keep the woman positively in her custody. The litigation against the parties is ongoing and the decision may continue and a pending civil suit between the parties will be the final decision. The Registrar of the High Court was instructed to retain the original document, the agreement and the original notice, which was transferred to the Sessions Judge. female advocates from Charsada lawyer