ABDUL QUDOOS BEHARI versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 491 Guardians and Wards Act (VIII of 1890), Sections 12 and 25 In the custody of a minor applicant, the juvenile was arrested once a week at his lawyer's office as directed by the High Court in the Habeas Corpus application. Had to be available. Under the Order of the Guardian Judge under Section 12, under the Guardians and Wards Act 1890, the applicant requested that she live with her brother at the place which was given the place of L, the applicant accompanied her. Had to go to M, so that was not possible. In order to present it in the usual manner, the High Court order was in the field and it was fortunate to have to comply with the Petitioner that the High Court, in its discretion, chose contempt of court proceedings for non-compliance with the directions of the court. Did not The removal of the minor from the jurisdiction of the court without the permission of the applicant was not justified
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Neelam lawyer