The West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 section 13 and 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), application for dismissal of section 11 was dismissed on the basis of which it was excluded on the basis of default and slabing petition. And claimed he was a tenant under Defendant 1. No contact with the other four respondents The rent controller approved the order under section 13 (6) of the Ordinance for the submission of rent arrears and, on non-compliance, the order for the tenant to dismiss the tenant. The appellate court submitted that it was acquitted by the collusion. Defendant No. 1 but his appeal was dismissed. Nothing was available to show that the applicant was barred from holding the trial controller or the appellate court's appellate court in a full and equitable manner regarding his alleged acquittal but for the record's reasons. Later the fact was to find out that he had nothing. Suggest that any litigation regarding the title of the property in the dispute was already suspected of ownership of the dispute premises, the rent controlling or appellate court in which the so-called landlord inherits May force the tenant to evict the so-called tenant, in order to approach the civil court on the question of fraud or fraud with it. In the case of section 15 (7) of the ordinance, section 15 (7) times will not work as a provision of the civil suit only if no order has been given when the order or decision is sought in the civil court. Is. Rental controls
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
