Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION versus MUHAMMAAD SALEEM

Arts 185 (3) and 212 (3) civil service law respondent of the public importance were serving in the Income Tax Department and were not considered to be developed on the basis of performance testing for a specified period. The reports were not practically genuine HC. The constitutional jurisdiction ordered the performance evaluation reports to be completed by another officer who was once a senior officer of the respondents, special and unusual, because the defendant's senior confession was biased and his His performance as a criminal proceeding was initiated, therefore, the direction issued by the High Court was appropriate in the circumstances of the case, provided that the department assumes that he is a person Prepare and maintain officer performance report. The same, so that it could be used for other purposes and promotion, the relevant department, at the relevant point, neglected its responsibility in producing the performance reports of the respondents, therefore, the respondents had their constitutional right to do so. Under the jurisdiction, the High Court had the right to approach, as the department was turned over to the deprived officer of his right, due to his inaction, the direction issued by the High Court in the circumstances under Article 212 of the Constitution. The violation of the provisions cannot be declared, no substantial question of public importance law was raised by it. A. Authorities, Supreme Court Interference Guaranteed, Appeal Leave Denied list of advocates from Chak Sheza lawyer