MIR IKHLAQ AHMAD versus STATE
Sections 7, 10 (11A) and 19 (10) of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 9 and 10 (1), in the absence of evidence of natural justice, The principle of conviction and sentencing of the accused in the case in absentia was affirmed by the trial court hearing of the accused in absentia by the trial court, Arts 9 of the Constitution made by the trial court and 10 (1) was violated and under Section 10 (11A) Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, and cannot be allowed to be retained, the accused were not given any opportunity to be heard. Oh He was heard in a way that contradicts the principles of both natural justice decisions, punishments and punishments. Under the Constitution and the law violating, the courts below could not be sustained, which demanded a re-hearing of the case which led to the trial and sentencing. The accused and the trial court were allowed to appeal the law for a first verdict.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Jauharabad lawyer
