Find a Lawyer

MIR ALAM versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS

Sections 46 and 48 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Respondents denying service, issue an order before the High Court under section 48 (1) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. The respondents of the said appeal had filed an application under section 48 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 which was decided by the High Court under a non-controversial order under which the membership of the respondent as a member of the trade union The court was reinstated while handling the petition filed by the defendants was Under Section 48 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, material facts were completely ignored, which, if considered, industrial relations. The above order never allows the High Court to deal with the application under section 48 (3) of the Ordinance 2002. , Did not take notice of the fact that the respondents' decision under section 48 (1) of the Ordinance was pending and it was not understandable that the fact was not brought to the notice of the High Court and this Strangely, the High Court should come to the conclusion that the Registrar, trade unions, should be instructed to conduct fresh elections while respondents are allowed to participate in the selection of collective bargaining agents, when they Were not even in service It was granted and allowed and the verdict of the Supreme Court could not be considered forbidden. Become an employer's worker until their appeals are decided in their favor lawer from fb area from Chaininda lawyer