MUHAMMAD ASIF versus STATE
Section 2 (2 (b)) Disposing of evidence In the event of a substantial distance from the complainant's office, there is no opportunity for the complainant to be present at the delay of approximately two to two hours in filing the FIR. Was not registered at the police station, hereditary views which were recorded after deliberation. Syed Situation has revealed that the prosecution's witnesses failed to explain the presence near the satisfactory location. The statement of the prosecution's witnesses was neither credible nor the medical evidence affecting the trust, to the extent that the prosecution's case was supported The victim lost his life due to the fireworks injuries, but did not go beyond the motive as no independent witness was presented, in the presence of which there was an alleged repetition between the parties. The accused were incited - never sent to trial, and no complaint was filed of the Aga. A 30 bore pistol and 3 live cartridges were recovered from the suspect's possession at the time of the arrest of the institute, but the pistol was recovered. There was no conclusions of the evidence of the crime, nor was their motive behind the incident. Be used against the accused for reasons. By chance, no vacancies were recovered. This recovered pistol was never sent to a specialist to know if it was meant to work. The pistol was recovered approximately seven weeks after the incident. And the recovery memo revealed that he was signed by two subordinate police officers and there was no independent witness involved with the suspect because of his suspicion.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Daud Khel lawyer