MOHIM KHAN versus STATE
Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The conviction of the accused was that the filing of the FIR was delayed by 18 hours. It was a nightly incident and the alleged confession was the result of the State Council repression, on the other hand, he argued that the confessional statement was recorded the next day and thus, no question of coercion could be raised and that The evidence was permanently confirmed with evidence. The recovery and validation of health-related medical data allowed the Supreme Court to appeal the findings of fact and to reach the correct conclusion in accordance with the prescribed principles of safe administration of criminal justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Topi lawyer
