Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

Clauses 4 364/99 and ?88 were available at the time of review of the evidence at the time of the witnesses' various statements where the suspicious eyewitness was interested in confessing in the prosecution's case and not having any compunction. Their presence cannot be safely testified. The matter was not properly investigated. The investigating officer made no attempt to include blood-stained land, crime vacancies, traces of dragging the abductors by the accused, and even pieces of the bodies. The suspect thrown into the canal has the benefit of the doubt and, in the circumstances, he is acquitted criminal advocate from Bannu lawyer