Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ DIWANA versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF

Civil Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 and 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Res Judeta, two cross-suits urging whether the decision in one of the jurisdictions operates and the other vendor's special performance decision while the vendor's Trial. Of the two appeals filed against the verdict, the appeal against the dismissal of the vendor case was dismissed for the declaration that the sale agreement was fraudulent, and the result of the fraud was excluded in a stable judgment. Was sold, during the second lawyer the seller died. It was requested by the vendor that the reason for the dismissal of the vendor's trial stated that the verdict and order would serve as a judiciary under which the lawsuit filed by the vendor was dismissed. The present appeal was under trial in a case where two cross-suits were settled and decided by a unanimous decision and decree, the aggrieved person was not obliged to file two separate appeals in this case. Appeal was not attracted to the principle of race jostata in such cases famous high court advocate from Shadiwal lawyer