MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus STATE
Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (1) (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 185 Re-sentencing of evidence; He was convicted and sentenced to death, which was confirmed by the High Court. The fact that the prosecution witnesses were police officers themselves could not be considered a better place to conclude their evidence. It has been alleged that he failed to cite any evidence that could have been intended to interfere. A minute later the High Court reviewed the findings of the crime by two courts below the evidence, which also confirmed the nature of the accused, in full harmony with the collection of eyewitnesses. And suggested that the deceased died as a result of fireworks injuries. The recoveries made during the investigation were properly rejected by the courts, believing that it was the result of the suspect's bullets that resulted in the death of the accused, and such factors justified the lesser punishment. A case of mitigation was made; the Supreme Court, while retaining the sentence, allowed partial death sentence to be up to life imprisonment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer