MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUC versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
Martial Law Regulation 1972 No. 115 Para 25 West Pakistan General Clauses Act (VII 1956), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 was passed in favor of the tenant / pre-empire in keeping with the pre-emption order On the due date, the sale price / pre-holder approached the trial court on the due date to submit the sale price and challan, but the bank closed its work to the public soon after that date. The bank denied it. The Eid holidays were closed for 4 days and after the Eid holidays, the pre-emptor deposited money on the next business day. The pre-importer / decree holder, who validly submitted the sale price on the next working day, was not responsible for the default and his case could not be dismissed on the basis that he was appointed. Failed to collect the sale price strictly on the date, without a law enforcement order and no legal effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Chaininda lawyer
