ASGHAR ALI versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS DOGAR
FIR admitted in appeal against section 302 (b) / 34, 459/34 and 394 offenses against property (enforcement hood) ordinance (VI 1979), section 20 constitution of Pakistan (1973), article 185 evil police officer. Left several locations. As the accused is vacant with regard to the FIR's parents, caste and village, much was recorded after considerable investigation, some manipulation and alteration was made by the doctor, who was effectively rushed to the hospital. Time was changing too. The identity of the suspects was extremely suspicious as the presence of witnesses at the time of the incident was not mentioned since the name of the victim and the wife of the victim and the presence of the deceased spouse, who was the natural witness of the house detainee, were injured. The recovery of the accused's shoes was a clear case in this case, which was later discovered, after which the suspect identified the size of the high cover. By a reasonable decision, the defendant's appeal was circumstantially dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer