Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AJMAL versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Section 26 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O VII, R 11 The suit was dismissed by the plaintiff on the rejection of the jurisdiction of the civil court immunity scheme approved by the Revenue Authorities. The pending case was dismissed under section 26 of Pakistan Stability. The Holding Ordinance, the appellate court of 1960, changed the dismissal of the case in rejecting the plaintiff's plea that the constitutional petition filed by him was dismissed by the High Court on a technical basis, The lawsuit did not prohibit the plaintiff's validity in this case. The constitutional plea was granted to the landowner, the quality of the land, the classification of the land and also that the plaintiff was given less land than he deserved while the defendants were given more rights than they had and he had the same authority. Was deprived of any power to come under the exclusive jurisdiction of the taxpayer c. The civil court's jurisdiction to decide on the stability proceedings held by the consolidation authorities was rightly dismissed by the West Pakistan Consolidation of The leave to appeal was denied under Article 26 of the Holdings Ordinance, 1960. lawer from fb area from Patika lawyer