SALEEM ULLAH KHAN versus STATE
Section 5 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the accused was registered after a thorough investigation by the Anti-Corruption Department, the accused who was a sub-inspector of police. , Became. Absconding from justice and taking action under section 8787 / under 88, the CCP prosecution effectively proved the accused against the accused for accepting illegal sums of Rs. 5000, confirming the evidence. After the accused's appeal was dismissed, there could be no material contradiction. In the case of the prosecution it should be pointed out that there was no consequence of the recovery of the bribe money only. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the affected decision did not face any legal weakness, allowing the appeal to be allowed. According to the Supreme Court, the accused denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer