IGI INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED versus ADMORE GAS (PVT.) LTD.
Sections 9 (2) and 10 (4) of the Banker's Evidence Act (XVIII of 1891) Sections 2 (8) and 4 apply for leave to defend the certificate of account statement by the principal accountant or manager for the recovery of the case. The defendant's statement regarding the authenticity of the dismissed plaintiff / bank account statement was that the account statement was not endorsed by the bank's principal accountant or manager under the Bank's Book Evidence Act, 1891, And instead a senior confirmed it. The officer, therefore, was defective at this point, after the leave was discharged to defend the application, such an objection could not be raised, and even in the defendant's defense the petition for leave, In the example, the account statement was neither false nor contradictory. Books in the Books Books Books Books Evidence Act, co when91 ent when entries were not rejected for good reasons in every financial institution. Used to be a principal accountant and manager, but it was not necessary that the designated designation be assigned to such officers or that any of their names No legal restriction was specified. Was available to a senior officer, who, in the opinion of the financial institution, was capable and capable of handling and monitoring the accounts, which the principal accountant or manager was not prepared to assign, the responsibility and the responsibility of the defendants. was done. The statement of account was not a senior officer or that there was no certificate officer in the statement of account, in the present case, it has been recognized that the plaintiff was a senior officer and lawyer of the financial institution, and Power in favor of it. Off to the attorney
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
