DR. SYED SABIR ALI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY, HEALTH PUNJAB
Principles 7 and 8 constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) publicity considerations for appellant, after he was removed, retired from the job while he was already in retirement for promotion, but on this basis his advertisement. It was not considered that a restraining order had been passed by the service tribunal in another appeal order stating that the appeal had been granted to protect the rights of the appellant and the authorities had to rely on the appellant on their own. There was no restriction in considering the appeal of the development in the circle and the appellant was wrongly barred from obtaining further development and the higher responsible Thus, excluding them not only deprived them of their legitimate right of promotion, but also the permanent loss of the pensionary benefit of the officials of the higher grade department, the Supreme Court had directed that promotion on the appellant's case. Consider for Perform its privileges and process within the stipulated time according to the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
