Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HABIB versus MST. SAFIA BIBI

Article 5 and the SHD Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the judgment was pronounced by the Family Court for the recovery of the articles related to the divorce by the divorced wife and the order was amended and added by the appellate court. The husband's confession was that there was no such list. The dowry articles were prepared at the time of the marriage, subsequently made similar and in the absence of receipts for the purchase of the said articles, the suit could not be decided and that the appellate court could be approved by the Family Court. Editing the decree was not legally valid and increasing the amounts revealed a list of articles that were usually given to the bride at her wedding, recorded by both courts in the above court. No known irregularities or irregularities in the facts were known and were sought by the High Court. It was retained by assigning the cogent. And for good reason, the Supreme Court did not face any legal contradiction, demanding the intervention of the Supreme Court, nor did any specific question about public import be dismissed by the Supreme Court. immigration advocate from Bewal lawyer