MUHAMMAD SAEED versus GHULAM SARWAR
The appointment of an order by the R17 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), section 164 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 of the Board of Revenue Intervention was approved under Article 199 of the Constitution Order. ? No attractive ground was disclosed by the Board of Revenue as to why the authority appointment order was set aside. The Effect Board of Revenue had a legal duty to interpret the law, apply it to individual cases it faced, and present it. Under the jurisdiction of the High Court, and may be amended by the Board of Revenue for any subordinate of the organization to understand, apply or enforce the law, If this was the case, then without any correction, the High Court Appointment Authority did not face any legal weakness as a result of the restoration of the appointment of a lumberman as a result of the breach of the rule of law. The Supreme Court's request for leave to intervene was excluded \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer
