Find a Lawyer

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION versus KHALIL AHMAD

Sections 29 and 31 of the Specific Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 disciplinary proceedings, the scope of jurisdiction over the plaintiff's board being subjected to disciplinary proceedings and the civil court trial court in favor of the employee He was sentenced before the trial. Prior to the dismissal, the Board specifically dismissed the Lower Appellate Court and the High Court, all disciplinary proceedings were withheld by the Board for appeal and revision, reversing the board's submission. It was rejected that the civil courts generally had jurisdiction to question any order passed under the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education. The Act, 1976 was dismissed, therefore, the provisions of section 31 of the Punjab Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Act 1976 filed by the employees could not be entertained, usually terminating the jurisdiction of the Civil Court. Was not done, but only the officials were prosecuted. The Diet and Secondary Education Act, 1976, which worked in good faith with the provision of section 29 of the Punjab Board of Interim, had also not completely abolished the jurisdiction of the civil court to prevent the courts from examining it. Whether this action is within the purview of the law or not, therefore, the law needed to be enacted to investigate whether it should be repealed. Such a basis was only possible if the objection to the jurisdiction of the civil court was raised in a written statement. female advocates from Doltala lawyer