KANIZ FATIMA versus WALI MUHAMMAD
Section & and ??? Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2? A, 8, 199 and Schedule I, Part III? Muslim and Family Laws of Sections 7 and 8 are not and are not contradictory to the basic concepts of the Ordinance Islam. Under Article 2 of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, an Article of the Constitution (1973), there is no jurisdiction to revoke the provisions of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961? After being included in the first schedule of the Constitution, Part III, becoming a part of the Constitution, the Constitution is exempt from the operation of Articles 8 (1) and (2) of the Muslim Family Law Ordinance, 1961, the High Court does not have a constitution. Should any law, which is protected under the Constitution of Article 199, be regarded as a consolidation of Islam? The High Court, because of the constitution, has to make a strict decision according to the constitution and thus it can do the job of declaring no one as equal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Yazman Mandi lawyer