DR. ALTAF HUSSIAN GARDEZI versus CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE
Removal of services on the basis of the results of a departmental inquiry under the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1975, on charges of constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) by public servants. ? , Without publicizing the posts, without preparation of the merit list and over and above the sanctioned power, the employee was granted amnesty in two successive interrogations; in the present case, the inquiry was, Field X Part, and the record shows. There was a flaw in the aforementioned process. The legal status of the inquiries was to prove the alleged misconduct proceedings against a civil servant and the public servant could not be held guilty - because he did not want the government employee to participate in the proceedings. Was dismissed from appeal by the present government employees who were accused by the public servant of being accused of violating the law and their cases were to decide each case according to their own merits. Received remand to the authorities to employ a government employee Punishment of removal from service, in these circumstances, be sufficient to eliminate mandatory retirement harsh punishment, inappropriate and out of proportion to the service. The appeal for leave to appeal by the Supreme Court was changed to appeal and allowed accordingly \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Islamabad lawyer
