MIAN KAMRAN ILAHI versus DIGRI SUGAR MILLS LIMITED
O XXXIX, Rr 1 & 2, O II, R 2 and Section 114 Special Relief Act (I of 1877) for the specific performance of the Contract, the plaintiff's grant claiming the sale of the Section 12 suit and the interim order to Chinese Was that the Chinese were not delivering through the defendants in accordance with the delivery orders and agreements and demanded the specific performance of the contracts and demanded additional damages, requesting a temporary injunction to create a third-party interest or To prevent the plaintiff's claim from selling to the extent of the claim, however, it was later amended so as not to include sugar in later seasons. Defendant's case was inter alia, that the plaintiff had no remaining responsibility for the supply of sugar and since the defendant had calculated and claimed the accounts in the case, there was no interim order. Or that specific performance can be held, that the notice of appointment of Nazir inspectors by the court confirms that the defendants are creating sugar by ordering third-party sugar to various buyers by ordering XX. XX may apply for a temporary contract to the claimant under Rule 2 of the CPC so that it can breach the contract. Whether to prevent damages, whether or not compensation was claimed in this case, the damages claimed by the claimant were claimed. The specific performance was not claimed as an alternative to relief except for loss or injury which the plaintiff had in breach of the plaintiff's contract cannot be counted on, and the proper course would be to defendants. Ban the violation. This
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
