Find a Lawyer

ACCOUNTANT GENERAL FOR PAKISTAN (REVENUE) THROUGH AUDITOR-GENERAL versus ZIA MOHY-UD-DIN

The constitutional petitions filed by the petitioners for retaining Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and c 199 intra-court appeals were rejected by the High Court and such order of the High Court before the Supreme Court was postponed. It was held that in view of section 3 (2) of the Law Reform Ordinance, 1972, the appeal of the intra-court was authorized by which it did not avail. Applicants further claim that the High Court decided the constitutional petition. In the exercise of the original jurisdiction because the decision should have been challenged by the intra-court. Appeal effect was not complied with the provisions of the law, therefore, the petitions for leave of appeal were not officially filed in the Supreme Court, in view of the petitioners' petition, the Supreme Court appealed to the Supreme Court. That they consider the question of contempt. Of late, if an intra-court appeal was filed, the application was dealt with accordingly top advocates from Shankiari lawyer