Find a Lawyer

MANSUR-UL-HAQUE versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Article 9 (a) (vi) and 14 (a) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Corruption and misuse of powers by the process of corruption Against the irregularities of the legal proceedings and breach of the provisions of the law. Impact Crime and Punishment The High Court awarded the accused the honor and they were acquitted of the essential elements of the male consolidation of the offense committed under section 9 (a) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, and in this case Authorities were also failing. To prove that the defendant financed the organization (Pakistan Naval Shipping Corporation) for his own benefit or that the ships were not viable technology nor were there irregularities in matters of international quality and specification. ? Not sufficient to prove a crime under Section 9 (a) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, for the purpose of determining the question of immoral irregularities and criminal liability in a transgression of the law's obligatory clause The irregularities will lead to the action of a public utility under the jurisdiction of a criminal, which is distinguished by the Criminal Misconduct Act, which can prove to be a crime and unless it is established by it. Proof of evidence that such an act or series of acts in the transaction proved to be a crime would be baseless. They may be accused of misconduct due to mismanagement of the law applicable to their service, but may not have committed a criminal offense. Under section 9 (a) (vi) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, a person under section 10 of the ordinance or under another law attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Alipur lawyer