MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAN, NAB, ISLAMABAD
Section 497 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 32 (1) and 156 (1) (14) (82) of the bail, granting a further inquiry charge against the accused, allowed the payment of fraudulent claims Approved From the facts of the case, the question of whether the defendant deliberately accepted exemption claims in the fraudulent export transaction or relied on his subordinates in good faith pursuant to the rules Granted, in the light of documentary documents and oral evidence, the determination was still brought to the record. Without this, the entire record could not be considered without the opinion of the accused's guilt and there is no question whether the transaction. Whether or not I was in league with my co-accused. One of the beneficiaries could not be answered at the present stage, the relevant record and the documentary evidence collected during the investigation was with the prosecution and there was no question of tampering. The medical report also showed a strong case for the approval of the accused's bail in order to influence e-evidence or government testimony, ensuring the involvement of the accused in the transaction, in view of the principles of bail approval in non-bailable cases. As further inquiries. , The accused will be entitled to guarantees of eligibility as well as medical grounds.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
