Find a Lawyer

DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, AFFORESTATION DIVISION, SANGHAR AT KHIPRO versus KHAN THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS

Article 42 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 79 and AXXVII, R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Declaration of title suit by the care of the Government Consolidating facts through the courts of the Divisional Forest Officer Order of results suspended for The Department of Revenue Authorities appealed to the civil court regarding the case, claiming that the suit was exclusive of the Forest Trial Court, and the lower appellate court dismissed the case simultaneously, and appeals filed by Forest Officer judges and below The High Court upheld the orders passed by the courts. The validity of the results of the courts below the justification for the use of the amended jurisdiction and the legality of the High Court-approved decision did not result in any legal weakness or jurisdictional error; Failed to indicate not read the record. On the occasion of any abortion of justice below, the authorities could not say how the case has been set up by the division before the Civil Court, under the provisions of Sections 79 O and O XXVII, R 1, CPC. The sighting was against the officials and the provincial government in accordance with the law of the Iron Forest Officer, the facts filed by the Revenue Authorities were not open to the civil court for examination, however, the court was in the Supreme Court of Revenue for three parties. Source jurisdiction refuses to interfere with the decision and unlawfully detects an error and Appeal approved by the High Court was denied property advocates from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer