FAZAL-UR-REHMAN HANIF versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TALUKA POLICE STATION, MIRPURKHAS
Sections 6, 156 (1) (8) (89), 168 (2), 171 and 180 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the applicant in a vehicle operated by the applicant, belonging to the applicant. Tola gold has been recovered, a case was registered under section 156 (1) (8) (89) of the Customs Act 1969 and gold was recovered with the vehicle and filed by the Customs Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was also fined and special customs were filed through the appeal. The applicant was dismissed by the High Court. That the Traffic Police Inspector was not notified as a Customs Officer under Section 6 of the Customs Act 1969, he was not authorized to search the vehicle and seize the gold. That no notice was given under Sections 168 (2), 171 and 180 of the Customs Act, 1969, which required the prosecution, including judicial proceedings, that the action by the police and the customs authority was illegal and the gold recovered was not recovered. It was proved that the smuggling was not done and that the question of law was properly considered in the appeal by the High Court and that the constitutional petition should consider the disputes raised by the applicant. Had enough power. Appeal granted leave to consider applicant's evil \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
