Find a Lawyer

SHAHNAWAZ versus AMIR MUHAMMAD

AXVII, RR l & 3 and Section 100 Evidence Preparation Case Hearing Adjustment Trial Court granted the Defendant a very free motion for a compromise agreement for approximately two years, in which the court recognized the evidence and Approved for postponement of the settlement agreement, which was unapproved and highly questionable Once the defendant / appellant had the last opportunity to present evidence, the trial court found OXVII, RR 1 And 3 should have been pressed into the job and after giving the last chance, another delay should have resulted in a bailout and trial. Court should be in this position. The High Court did not approve the orders of the court for repeated recording of the practice of demanding another adjournment, fully justifying the order. registration advocate from Kamalia lawyer