SHAHID ANSARI versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU (NAB), ISLAMABAD
Section 18 (f) (g) and 19 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Pakistan Fourth Constitution, Article 199 Constitution Petition Notice, Disapproval of Scope Petitioners They were saddened by the notice issued by NAB and they Demanded an end to the proceedings. The issuance of a valid notice, even if it is not found within its purpose and purpose, may not, in any case, justify the termination of the root (section 18 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999). (C) an inquiry initiated under (c) or as a sword to be excluded from the right to seek the truth for the simple reason that a competent officer (the investigating officer) was negligent in not properly issuing the notice. Was. Rule XI of the Code of Criminal Procedure means, in 1898, that there would be no cost of crime for absenteeism because the rule could cure any disorder or illegality but not effect and effect. The crime, even if it was committed, allowed him to be touched, when it did, the effects began but the investigation officer found the code to be a mistake, irregular, and even illegal. The implications and consequences of the court can be ascertained. Authorities cannot refrain from issuing callup notices or inquiries / inquiries as inquiries / inquiries under the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 will be required to deal with the provisions of Sections 18 (f) and (g) of the Ordinance. Accordingly disposed of
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
