Find a Lawyer

TAYYAB HUSSAIN versus ANSARI ALI

Article 302/382/411/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeals and acquittals against acquittal by the High Court High Court were considered on the material evidence of every evidence on record when the incident. The presence of witnesses on the scene of a dark night was not without doubt, neither the criminals were named in the FIR nor any identity parade was held so that the witnesses could be identified through the prosecution. can go. Eyewitnesses were not residents of the area and failed to explain their presence. The recovery of the weapons from the accused on the spot did not result, as the vacancies recovered from the incident site were not sent to the forensic science laboratory for comparison, the investigating officer admitted that no witnesses to the prosecution Did not give their names. In his statement under Section 161, the accused, the CCP breach decision was considered unimaginable and refused to complain accordingly that no interference was guaranteed. best advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer