Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR versus FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, ISLAMAMAD

Paragraph 18 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Ability to re-assign basic facts to the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court Scope Deputy Land Commissioner, in the present case, after remand by Federal Land. The Commission made a complete inquiry and prepared a list of eligible persons and ordered accordingly, so, subject to all exceptions, in the constitutional jurisdiction, in the case in which the facts were, the High Court should be further investigated. Did not need. Not disputable in this manner, it may give appropriate order regarding the qualifications in respect of the legal rights of the parties involved and the matter should not be remanded to a lower forum which may not serve any purpose other than length. Judgment of litigation presented by the court in the light of the material available on the record, without appreciating the legal and factual aspects of the case and determining the right to allotment of R, the correct use of the prescribed land, jurisdictional High Court. Was not, in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case with such background, according to the letters and the spirit The question of eligibility of the parties was required to be determined and instead remanded for the matter. The Land Commission should have passed an appropriate order on the merits based on the available records, the Supreme Court allowed the High Court to appeal the decision and the High Court remanded the decision on the constitutional application as per law. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n us immigration advocates from Chak Jamal lawyer