Find a Lawyer

BEVI BADSHAH BEGUM versus SULTANA BEGUM

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 evidence, closely related to the investigation of eyewitnesses, has not only improved their version of the trial but also hid some material facts on record and the opportunity to be taken. But their presence was found suspicious. A contradictory piece of evidence appears to be the story presented by both witnesses about the incident. Eyewitnesses contradict each other in relation to material points, such as the specific role of the accused and the time of the incident, and their testimony is neither proved by medical evidence nor by recovery. The recovery of the weapons of the crime was suspected and after consultation and deliberation there was no benefit of filing an FIR as there was a serious suspicion that a person could not be employed in the case. Is. Several shops and two markets were enclosed at the site of the rejection, but not a single disqualified place was presented by the prosecution prosecution, held without doubt, failing to prove their case against the accused. The suspects were acquitted. top civil advocates from Fort Abbas lawyer