Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS versus STATE

Sections 2?2 (b) and 4 of Pakistan4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were in accordance with the prosecution's witness / the victim's brother, who suffered gunshot wounds, in a statement made by the police officer. What was His presence at the scene of the incident with his deceased brother cannot be doubted at the relevant time, in the presence of medical evidence presented to confirm his testimony that his deceased brother was injured. Prosecutors found the witness to be quite natural and credible. He suffered injuries from being shot, dismissed or not admitted in the motive portion of the prosecution's trial, denied the general statement of the injured himself. Will not be enough to do this, which will, without any possibility, leave the matter. The deceased's post-mortem report also confirmed the testimony of the injured witness, who is actually the culprit and instead included an innocent person. Other pieces of circumstantial evidence, such as the recovery of the stained blood of the deceased and the injured, the site plan, in the incident prepared at Injury Sheet Hospital, occurred just outside the door of the accused's home, Due to the possible location of the suspects or the busy place of the incident, it cannot be ruled out by a passerby. The accused was properly praised by the Supreme Court in its true context. The appeal for leave was dismissed top advocate from Upper Dir lawyer