Find a Lawyer

AHMED KHAN versus STATE

Sections 4 (4) and 6 516 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) forfeiture of the bond of bail was applied by the applicant to the bond of bail which, after hearing, was filed before the court Could have been offered, but to do so on his failure, his bail was confiscated The petitioner's case was that the hardened criminals under question had been stripped of their possession for which the FIR Was entered. And that despite strong efforts, neither the car nor the criminals have been brought into the book. It was in this account that the applicant could not prepare his car for robbery just five weeks before the trial court petitioner handed him over to the court before he could not move. Could Records that the FIR filed by the applicant regarding the snatching of the car by the hardened criminals from the possession of the applicant was incorrect or fake, and the local police could not find any trace of the car which caused it There was no trace, until recently, that it was not already in the court's view of the car's production before the trial court's view and as confirmed by the High Court, it appears that the law on the face of the record The law will not punish a person without criminal intent, who committed it without any criminal intent. For clear defense, a deliberate and compromised defaulter in compliance with the terms of the bond cannot be said that the appeal for leave of appeal was changed to appeal and it was accepted. As well as the lower courts advocate from Jehangira lawyer