Find a Lawyer

H. MUNAWAR ALI versus SARWAR BANO

Upon receipt of this Report of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 403 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (VII of 1963), Section 10 of the Retail District Magistrate, Tribunal. That the prosecution failed. Establish a case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt and acquit the accused, but the convicted accomplices challenged their sentence in the constitutional jurisdiction before the High Court, and the High Court upheld the order of the District Magistrate without charge. Authorized and usually ordered a trial. The reason for the court affecting the High Court decision was that the tribunal failed to present its report to the district magistrate as of its due date. On the strength of the High Court order, a trial was started by a magistrate who issued a non-bailable warrant against the accused. , The magistrate could not proceed against the petitioner for hearing of the judgment of the High Court under his hearing. Good judgment was taken against only one person and only against the co-accused. A person convicted and acquitted by a competent court of justice cannot be retired for the same offense as long as the evil army remains in a competent court. A competent court order can decide right or wrong if the warrant is not issued before the competent forum without the challenge, the final victory, and the warrant issued against the accused. registration advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer