SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR versus ASFANDIAR KHAN
A IX, R 13 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Ex-jurisdiction, Knowing the limitation of proceedings existing by the courts below the defendants The results, after taking part in the action. The request to set aside the previous Persian decree was rejected because the trial was dismissed because the application for separation of the former Persian decree was filed with the lower appellate court 15 months after the court-issued order. Was raised by the High Court Playa. It was through the defendants that the limit for filing an application for ex parte decree in such a case was three years and not a validity of 30 days as it was in the knowledge of the defendants that their case was pending. And they were declared ex parte, Article 64 of the Limitation Act, 1908 was implemented, under which the delay in transferring the application for delay was 30 days. The Supreme Court could not find any reason for interference. The leave to appeal the simultaneous finding of the courts below was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Kala Bagh lawyer