FARZAND ALI versus THE STATE
Pakistan Panel Code Section 326/148/149 The value of the evidence was no proof that the firearms recovered from the accused were used in the commission of the crime. The declared motive of the accused was to target the attack but they did not. Lost his left eye and tried to figure out what moved the perpetrators of the crime. Was there anything different from what they had done in the daytime and people were working in the nearby field, but no one was reported to have seen the incident or was attracted to the place Because the prosecution was not attracted to the matter because no independent respect for the location was attached, the witness of the incident was not credible and his claim that he was an eyewitness to the incid was thus against the accused. Not prosecuting was not beyond reasonable doubt, and in the circumstances a conviction or sentence was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Dadakhel lawyer