MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus MUHAMMAD MUNSHI
Article 42 and Constitution 54 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 were appealed to the Supreme Court suit for trial and permanent injunction, as well as the trial court and the appellate court, but the High Court partial. To the extent that the decision was made in favor of the respondents. The suit land collector, on the basis of the certificate of attainment and the allotment chit, received a registered sale deed in favor of the appellant after which the mutant registrant rights holder Samin also showed that the suit land was transferred in the name of the appellant. ? As the High Court claimed that the respondents who had competed on the suit land were granted the privilege, the declaration of the defendants' claim in these circumstances was not partly valid because their owners of the same High Court Could not disregard the evidence. Appeal for transfer / sale of suit land and grant of ownership rights to Mangla Dee victims Appeal The High Court's unclean decision has resulted in the misrepresentation and non-recourse of the material evidence on record and this is also required by law. The appeal was not sustained and the unclean decision of the High Court was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jhang lawyer