Protection of proceedings in Section 9 Sports (Development and Control) Ordinance (XVI of 1962), Sections 3 and 4 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 55 of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185, 8 and 4 It was proposed to take appropriate action against the scope professional cricket that was involved in betting and match-fixing, resulting in the government's notification to the High Court judge under the Pakistan Commission of Inquiry Act. Appointed a member inquiry Investigating the matter in 1956, the Commission of Inquiry found Cricket guilty on a charge that recommended a life imprisonment on cricket for a fine of Rs 1 million, under which it was recommended. ? No commission or order was passed in connection with the ban on playing cricket Cricket has filed a declaration against the board's move and for a permanent injunction LD, the commission has no authority to suggest any fines Which was not provided under the law and as a result, neither the cricket board nor any person acting on its behalf had the authority to impose such penalties, if it were not so. He will pay a fine. Appeal against a board order can sue against the rules of such order \ r suit n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
