Find a Lawyer

IBRAR KHAN versus SANAULLAH KHAN

The suit for the possession of the respondents by section 8 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), section 28 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was decided by the trial court, but the appellate court high court granted them Dismissed, however, the review petition restored the appellate court-approved rulings and orders filed by the defendants, and the trial court-approved decisions and orders on the ground that the applicants were in dispute. There were conflicting requests for land ownership. The land, in the dispute and also that they had taken possession of the said land negatively, and therefore the respondents could not be allowed, the law stated that the validity of the land was properly found by the High Court. That the applicants could not meet the prescribed conditions. Under Section 28 of the Limitation Act, 1908 and even otherwise, it has been stated that the provisions of the law have been declared un-Islamic which has helped the respondents. ts, according to oral and documentary documents, to prove that they owned the dispute in the High Court based on the evidence on record, had rightly concluded that the appeal decision was factual and Legal weaknesses have been encountered, which cannot be met. The judgment of the High Court can be overlooked property advocates from Khushab lawyer