Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL, KARACHI versus NIZAM IMPEX (PVT.) LTD.

Section 34 additional tax penalty does not apply to the provision of section 34 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, but arbitrary payment or theft of sales tax will attract the provisions of Section 34 of the Sales Tax Act 1990, but otherwise not me.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. HIGHWAY GENERAL TRADING CO. 2014 CLD 491
• AKHLAQUE KHAN v. MUHAMMAD JAVAID SHAIKH 2014 CLC 492
• MADAD ALI v. State 2014 MLD 493
• Syed QAMAR ALAM v. State 2014 YLR 497
• HUBDAR ALI v. State 2014 PCrLJ 498
• KAMRAN MIRZA v. MOAZZAM MIRZA 2014 PLD 500
• AHMED v. RASOOL BAKHSH 2014 MLD 501
• ABDUL HAMEED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary, Government of Sindh 2014 PLD 501

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

best advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes