MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE
Speedy Court of Speedy Trials Act 1987 Section 5 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Special Court sentenced and convicted the accused under Section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, which found that the crime was the same During the course of the transaction in which the accused committed a crime under Section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, the Schedule is not a crime for the purposes of the Special Courts of Special Courts Act, 1987, it is not clear if the accused is allegedly If the pistol that was recovered was used in the commission of the hood competition. The fact that under Section 13 of the Arms Ordinance, 1965, the accused was not charged with a crime in the robbery case, it cannot be said that the robbery was committed nor the government is eligible for special court. Order the trial of this case, nor did the special court have jurisdiction to hear the same case in which the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Ghazi lawyer
