Find a Lawyer

SUO MOTU CASE NO.10 OF 2007 versus

Article 184 (3) Concepts of Supreme Court powers, jurisdiction, and jurisdictional judicial review in relation to infringement of fundamental rights granted to the people under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution for the purpose of administrative process and use Policies for the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution and the judicial powers of the High Court powers under Article 199 of the Constitution, the Supreme Court, in exercising its powers under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, were not considered Used to go Interference in controlling policy decisions and administrative matters of the government, but the Supreme Court's intervention in violating the fundamental rights of the people at large and their enforcement is not always valid. Courts should not practice departure. ? The constitutionality of the government's failure to properly regulate the enforcement of fundamental rights, especially the use of articles and essential commodities in relation to the enforcement of fundamental rights to the public, as a solution to judicial principles or to the executive policy or social policy of the executive authority. Must be in jurisdiction and have public importance responsibilities. The government identified it law websites from Kurram Agency lawyer